Kentucky Democrats criticized the police for insulting the police

Dwight RitchieMarch 13, 2021

416 2 minutes read

Democratic Senator Gerald Neal, who represents the majority of blacks in western Louisville, said he was insulted by Carroll’s bill, which he saw as a direct
attack on his voters who protested and demanded racist justice.

This is another hammer in my area, Neil said. This is a reverse shot and I’m pissing him off. I personally piss him off.

Angry Blue has said twice how dare you call the bill under this body. He is intelligent. Provocative. This is unnecessary. Illogical.

Since the law already contains books on violent insurgents, Brauna Taylor said after months of protests following the deadly police attacks, the city could
be harmed by the reunification and recovery. .

Meanwhile, law professors and lawyers say the bill violates the First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution, which include freedom of
expression, equal protection and judicial process.

If admitted, they said it was probably too vague and broad enough to admit guilt against appeal.

If challenged, the US Supreme Court may decide that no law can be enforced based on the uncertainty doctrine, or if it is too ambiguous for the average
citizen to understand, said Jeffrey Stone, professor at the University of Chicago Law School. .

The permissible, protected speech on the bill would be cool because the rational person doesn’t know what behavior is prohibited or allowed, Stone said.

First Amendment lawyer Michael Abbott, who represents the Courier Journal, which is part of the USA Today network, says that when you start to commit
insulting a certain type of government employee, the law will be unconstitutional in all its applications. .

He said that if police officers were emotionally damaged, he gave much more discretion in detention.

Abete said the bill presented incredibly serious First Amendment issues that were far from what the Constitution would allow. Senate Act 211 is so vague and
so broad that it said it would be a crime to say that nobody likes the police.

I think this is dangerous because we are already using the current law of the police to impose on the protesters. Abbott said the new law could open the door
to accusation based on their own feelings and how they prove themselves threatened.

Amid Thursday evening criticism from Neil and other Democrats, Carroll stood behind the bill saying that the legislature would take steps to protect police
officers and property in Louisville, Mayor Greg Fischer failed to take it last year.

Carroll said the silent majority in the state supports the law. They are just as disturbed by what happened in Louisville as it was in this country. I will
not apologize for this bill.

Senator Reggie Thomas said that adopting a bill like D-Lexington, SB211 could give the Louisville Police Civil Review Board sub-penny powers for the session
and specific racial justice studies.

Senator Morgan McGarvey criticized the section on insulting the D-Louisville police and pointed out that those arrested on such charges should be detained
for at least 48 hours – this sentence does not automatically cover those arrested for murder, rape or arson. Kentucky.

McGarvey said the bill breaks what we’re working on improvement. It exacerbates the split and puts us in a way that I can’t legally believe this body wants
us to go.

Majority of Republicans, including Louisville Senator Julie Rock Adams, were asked to vote against the bill, on the grounds that they opposed the 48-hour
mandate and the verdict of insulting or insulting the police.

https://opcaonline.org/advert/official-tv-drake-vs-san-diego-live-online-ncaa-division-i-football/

https://opcaonline.org/advert/official-tv-delaware-state-vs-sc-state-live-online-ncaa-division-i-football/