Tiger Woods In the early stages of the investigation into why Tiger Woods crashed into his car on February 23, forensic experts said Los Angeles County
Sheriff’s Department officials made a critical decision that favored Woods and effectively benefited him from suspicion.
Sheriff Alex Valanueva announced that day that his representatives had seen no evidence of weaknesses regarding the golf legend because they had squeezed him
into his overturned SUV.
A day later, Villanueva declared the accident a “perfect accident” and said there was no need to bring in a drug-knowing expert to assess Woods’ weakness
shortly after the car broke down.
On February 24, Villanueva said that the drug identification specialist does not need to respond to further evaluation. This is an accident.
However, the available evidence in the case suggests that Woods’ car was either careless or asleep when he entered the median directly on the right and
without turning into his lane. Woods told reporters twice that he did not remember how the accident happened and that he did not remember driving after
surviving the accident with a broken bone in his right leg.
Experts questioned the decision of the two special sheriff departments because such clues are under investigation, including the absence of road-breaking
evidence.
Far away now the accident was framed as an accident Hours after the accident, both the sheriff and the deputy who answered the 911 call highlighted the
landing path as a possible cause.
To avoid bringing in a Drug Recognition Specialist (DRE), law enforcement officer trained to detect the vulnerability and determines whether the driver’s
blood should be tested for drugs or other drugs. It may be routine to call DRE in a serious accident investigation, but it depends on each agency
responsible.
The Sheriff’s Department said on Friday that the LASD is not currently publishing any further information. Traffic accidents are being investigated and
traffic inspectors are working to determine the cause of the collisions.
Woods agent Mark Steinberg did not respond to a call asking for comment.
The accident reconstruction experts said Woods’ inability to drive was sufficient reason to bring in the DRE when the investigation was fully conducted.
That’s exactly right, said Charles Shack, a former Hampshire State Police veteran who is now president of the Crash Specialists, a traffic accident analyst
for law firms and insurance companies. I thought you should evaluate him with the DRE to see if there are any physical clues to weakness outside of the
operation. For a trained person, sometimes the effects are somewhat uncertain and some more in-depth testing is required to bring evidence of weakness.
DREs do not automatically require blood tests. Instead, it is determined at the end of the 12-step process whether it is needed or not. This protocol can
take place away from the crash scene and involves asking the driver about medications and examining the driver’s eyes and vital signs.
The day after the accident, Villanueva gave the following reasons for not bringing DRE to Woods’ case:
Villanueva said Tiger Woods, a lawmaker at the crime scene, was diagnosed with the condition and there is no evidence of any disability. The obvious one will
not question the smell of alcohol, the evidence of any drugs, drugs or the like. So it wasn’t a concern back then. So, of course there is no perfect field
test and DRE.
Forensic accident experts say that vulnerabilities are not always obvious to untrained officers, and the evidence in this case is more than a normal accident
that occurred as a result of momentary illogicality or loss of control. Jonathan Cherney, a former police detective who went to the scene after the accident,
said the evidence in the Woods case showed that sleeping behind the wheel was a classic case because the curvature of the road and the car went straight.
Woods, 45, was driving north that morning when his SUV hit the media straight without getting stuck on the road. The vehicle then crosses the middle and
leaves a sign, then crashes into a traffic lane on the side of the road and down the road before hitting a tree. It traveled about 400 feet in a relatively
straight line after hitting the Medyana, and the braking or steering input on the road deviated significantly from the path Woods took after it hit the media
without evidence.
Experts said that if he had just looked at his phone for a moment, they would expect evidence that they had dated the media long ago or tried to prove it.
Disabled people have a tendency to crash, so if you experience a situation like a single vehicle accident with an unusual situation, it should trigger the
first interrogator to inquire further and investigate vulnerability as a possible cause of the collision. Cherney said, Southern California Accident
Reconstruction.
Woods was described as a precaution at the scene of the crash, but was unable to walk with a broken bone in the lower part of his right leg. It had to be
worn on the backrest before going to the hospital. The statement of a deputy sheriff stated that he had a bruise on his face, but did not mention a head
injury. According to the sworn testimony, Woods wore his seat belt when placing the airbags. Airbags can cause facial injuries, but are combined with seat
belts to help prevent head injury.
Cherney said Woods had told the two delegates that he had never remembered driving.
I know people may not know or forget what happened as a result of a major head injury, ”said Cherney. His no memory of driving is also indicative and
consistent with the objective signs of poor driving.
If a DRE was called into the hospital to assess Woods, a blood test can show if there is any medication or other medication in his system. If drugs or drugs
are found in his system, he may be accused of driving under the influence of drugs.
However, there was no DRE that day, and no evidence of evidence was found by the sheriff, it was too late to access Woods ‘blood and medical reports at the
hospital without Woods’ co-operation or search warrant. To obtain authorization, the sheriff must appeal to the judge that is currently required and show the
possible cause of the offense.
Chris Taylor, executive attorney for Taylor & Taylor, a DUI defense expert in Southern California, said it would now be difficult for me to lay the
foundation for a search warrant.
Taylor said this was partly due to the lack of all the information available from the investigation: a DRE test, objective symptomatology, or any acceptance
of a driver.
Deputy Sheriff John Schweigel told USA Sports on March 2 that the ministry had not received an order for proof of evidence because there was no possible
reason to take it. Schweigel said at the time, we cannot assume that someone’s past was blaming them.
https://pasoroblespress.com/advert/live-estrada-vs-chocolatito-ii-live-full-fight-boxing-game/
In 2017, police slept on Woods Florida wheels, where he was arrested on suspicion of driving under the influence. Since then, a toxicology report has found
that its system contains the sleeping pill Ambien, along with other drugs such as Vicodin. In 2009, Woods was involved in another car accident with his SUV,
and in a police report, eyewitnesses described him as an unconscious and on-the-spot snail. Woods was shown for reckless driving, but no medical records were
found by law enforcement.
Cherney noted that although most people do not expect to see a disabled driver in the early hours of the Ods accident, disabled driving can be 24 hours a
day. For example, Ambien’s label warns against disability the day after drinking, unlike alcohol.
DREs are often aware of this and are trained to investigate their symptoms. Sergeant Highway Patrol from US Sports California contacted the state-wide DRE
coordinator, Glenn Glazer, in California. Woods refused to discuss his case specifically and instead discussed DRE protocols in general.
Whenever we suffer serious injury or loss of life, I try to evaluate all drivers, even if we are not afraid of vulnerability, because it can help people line
up, Glazer said, noting how future legal information can help the conflict. It’s always nice to investigate someone thoroughly
What if a driver told the response officer at the time of the accident that he had no memory of driving?
If you were to say to a drug recognition expert, ‘Hey, this person didn’t want to drive on the scene or it’s too inappropriate’, that would be a formula we
want to follow, because some drugs have certain effects on people. Glasser, the body, says.
A few days after the accident, the sheriff’s department issued a search warrant for black box data that could show how fast Woods was moving out of his car
and any braking or steering action before it crashed. The sheriff’s office did not immediately respond to a call asking for comment.
The sheriff’s department was outraged at his initial assessment that the accident was an accident, and said he only made preliminary observations.
Felix Lee, a business collier restructuring consultant who is part of a network of specialist institutes for the case, says that from our point of view there
is nothing like an accident. “What are the contributors?” How can they arrive at this conclusion if they don’t know the drive’s speed, input, or anything
like that?
The reasons for the possible contribution to the introduction of a DRE on February 23 may also be denied.
Schach, a former state soldier, said this is a high-profile accident because of the person involved, but I would expect him to be treated the same as anyone
else driving. I think you’ll have to try a little deeper to make sure it doesn’t get lost.